Exabeam vs. IBM QRadar and Cortex XSIAM: Four Ways to Compare and Evaluate
ガイド
A framework for choosing the right security operations platform for modern threat detection, investigation, and response (TDIR)
Choosing a security operations platform involves weighing trade-offs between legacy SIEMs, consolidated single-vendor solutions, and purpose-built platforms. Legacy tools like IBM QRadar often require significant manual rule tuning and lead to slow investigations. Consolidated platforms like Cortex XSIAM may promise simplicity but can create vendor lock-in, limiting your security stack flexibility.
There is a third option: a platform engineered specifically for security operations that is both powerful and vendor agnostic. This guide provides a clear framework to compare these three distinct approaches. It moves beyond marketing claims to evaluate core technical capabilities, helping you select the platform that will deliver the best security outcomes for your organization.
このガイドでは、その方法を学ぶことができる：
- Analyze the core analytics engines to see how behavioral analytics detect complex insider threats that correlation rules and endpoint-centric systems often miss.
- Quantify the value of automation by comparing the output of automated threat timelines against the manual queries required by legacy SIEM platforms.
- Assess the strategic advantage of an open platform with an extensive library of prebuilt parsers, which allows you to integrate new security tools without penalty.
- Calculate a more accurate total cost of ownership (TCO) by comparing a predictable pricing model against the volume-based ingestion costs and platform lock-in fees common to other solutions.
Download the guide to make an informed, data-driven decision for your security operations team.
ガイドを入手するExabeamがQRadar（およびXSIAM）よりも優れたセキュリティ成果をもたらす4つの方法
以下のフォームにご記入の上、送信してください。