Skip to content

Exabeam Delivers First Configurable Peer Benchmarking for CISO Decision-Making — Read the Release

The Rise of AI-Generated Attacks: Why UEBA is the Best Defense

  • Feb 24, 2025
  • Kevin Binder
  • 6 minutes to read

Table of Contents

    Introduction: The New Cyberthreat Landscape

    The cybersecurity industry is facing a new challenge: AI-generated attacks. With the rapid advancement of generative AI, cybercriminals now have access to sophisticated tools that enable them to craft highly targeted attacks with minimal technical expertise. Unlike traditional attack methods that require deep programming knowledge, AI-driven attacks allow even non-technical malicious actors to create malware, exploit scripts, and launch phishing campaigns with ease. This shift is leading to a surge in novel, previously unseen attack patterns that evade traditional security measures.

    The problem is clear: If attacks don’t have known indicators of compromise (IoCs), how can they be detected? Conventional security approaches—such as threat intelligence feeds and correlation rules—are struggling to keep up with this new wave of AI-powered threats. The evolving nature of these attacks requires a behavior-based security model—one that analyzes patterns, detects anomalies, and adapts dynamically to emerging threats.

    This blog explores how generative AI is fueling unknown attacks, why traditional detection methods are failing, and why User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) is the best defense against this growing threat.

    How Generative AI Is Fueling Unknown Attacks

    Cyberattacks used to follow predictable patterns, often relying on known vulnerabilities or established social engineering tactics. AI-generated attacks are breaking this mold, allowing threat actors to automate, customize, and evolve their methods in real time.

    The Democratization of Cybercrime

    Traditionally, cyberattacks required significant technical expertise. Now, generative AI tools can create exploit scripts, phishing emails, and malware variants at the click of a button. This means that less-skilled individuals can launch highly effective attacks, increasing both the volume and sophistication of cyberthreats.

    For example, AI-powered tools can generate convincing spear-phishing emails tailored to specific individuals, making them much harder to detect. Attackers can also create polymorphic malware that continuously mutates to evade signature-based detection methods.

    The Rise of Adaptive Attacks

    Unlike static, pre-programmed attacks, AI-assisted cyberthreats can adjust their tactics dynamically. For example:

    • Malware can rewrite its own code to avoid detection by antivirus software.
    • Brute-force attacks can leverage AI to modify login attempts, IP addresses, and device fingerprints to appear legitimate.
    • Phishing attacks can generate hyper-personalized messages that bypass spam filters.

    As a result, traditional security tools are struggling to keep pace with AI’s ability to adapt and create attacks that don’t fit known patterns.

    Why Threat Intelligence Feeds and Correlation Rules Are Less Effective

    For years, security teams have relied on threat intelligence feeds and correlation rules to detect cyberthreats. However, these traditional methods are proving to be insufficient in stopping AI-generated attacks.

    Threat Intelligence Feeds: Falling Behind Evolving Attacks

    Threat intelligence feeds collect known IoCs—such as malware signatures, suspicious IP addresses, and attack patterns—and alert security teams when a match is found. However, this method has a critical flaw: AI-generated attacks often have no known IoCs.

    Since AI can generate unique, customized attack variants for each target, traditional threat intelligence feeds cannot keep up. Attackers can easily modify code structures, execution methods, and attack delivery mechanisms, making detection by signature-based defenses nearly impossible.

    Correlation Rules: Too Rigid for AI-Powered Attacks

    Most security information and event management (SIEM) platforms rely on correlation rules to detect attacks based on predefined sequences of events. For example, a rule might trigger an alert if a user logs in from an unusual location and downloads large amounts of data. However, AI-generated attacks are highly adaptable, often changing just enough to avoid triggering these static rules.

    Correlation rules have two major limitations:

    • They require constant updates. As new attack methods emerge, security teams must rewrite and fine-tune rules.
    • They generate too many false positives. Legitimate activity is often flagged as suspicious, leading to alert fatigue.

    With AI-powered threats evolving in real time, rule-based detection methods simply cannot keep pace.

    Why UEBA Is the Best Defense Against AI-Generated Attacks

    To effectively combat unknown, AI-generated attacks, security teams need a behavior-based approach. This is where UEBA comes in.

    Understanding Behavioral-Based Detection

    Unlike traditional security methods that rely on static rules or known signatures, UEBA detects anomalies by establishing a baseline of normal behavior and flagging deviations. This allows security teams to identify threats even when there are no prior IoCs or predefined attack patterns.

    For example, UEBA can detect if:

    • A user logs in from an unusual location at an odd hour.
    • A privileged account accesses sensitive files it has never interacted with before.
    • A system begins transferring unusually large volumes of data to an external service.

    By analyzing patterns of behavior instead of relying on predefined rules, UEBA can spot subtle, emerging threats that other tools miss.

    Table 1Evaluating threat detection strategies against AI-generated cyberattacks: A comparison of UEBA, correlation rules, and threat intelligence reveals that behavior-based analytics offers superior detection of novel, unknown threats, outperforming traditional, static methods.

    Feature UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics) Correlation Rules (Logic Trees) Threat Intelligence Feeds
    Detection of Unknown Threats Highly Effective: Uses machine learning to detect anomalies in behavior, identifying previously unseen, novel attack patterns. Ineffective: Relies on predefined patterns and signatures; unable to detect new, unrecognized attack vectors. Limited: Can only detect threats already identified and shared within the threat intel community.
    Adaptability to AI-Generated Attacks Dynamic: Continuously learns and adapts to new behaviors, making it ideal for evolving AI-driven threats. Static: Rules must be manually updated; can’t keep pace with the rapid evolution of AI-generated attacks. Reactive: Depends on the discovery and dissemination of known threats; not proactive against new AI threats.
    False Positive Rate Lower: Contextual understanding of normal behavior reduces false positives. High: Rigid rules can trigger many false positives, overwhelming security teams. Variable: Depends on the accuracy and relevance of the shared intelligence.
    Speed of Detection Real Time: Quickly identifies deviations from normal behavior, enabling faster response. Delayed: Detection is only as fast as the rules are comprehensive; misses novel threats. Lagging: Relies on external updates which can delay detection of new threats.
    Resource Intensity Efficient: Automates detection processes, reducing the need for constant manual oversight. Labor Intensive: Requires continuous rule creation and tuning, which is resource heavy. Resource Light: Ingesting intel is easy, but it doesn’t actively detect threats on its own.
    Ability to Detect Sophisticated Attacks Superior: Identifies subtle, sophisticated attacks that blend in with normal behavior. Weak: Cannot detect complex attacks that don’t fit existing rule logic. Weak: Can only flag known sophisticated threats; misses zero-day or novel attacks.
    Scalability Highly Scalable: Handles large datasets and diverse environments effectively. Limited: Becomes unmanageable with growing complexity in rule sets. Moderately Scalable: Scales with the volume of shared intelligence but lacks active detection capabilities.
    Resilience to AI Evasion Tactics Strong: Hard for attackers to predict or mimic normal behavior patterns precisely enough to evade detection. Weak: AI-generated attacks can easily circumvent static rules by exploiting their rigidity. Weak: Attackers can modify tactics faster than threat intel updates can respond.

    How Exabeam UEBA Eliminates Noise and Reduces False Positives

    One of the biggest challenges in cybersecurity is alert fatigue, where security teams are overwhelmed by false positives. Exabeam UEBA addresses this issue with two key features:

    • Detection groupings: UEBA stitches together multiple alerts into a single timeline, eliminating one-off anomaly alerts that might otherwise be dismissed as false positives.
    • Dynamic multi-layer risk scoring: Instead of flagging every small anomaly, UEBA assigns a risk score to each automatically generated case (or alert), allowing security teams to prioritize high-risk activity effectively.

    By automating anomaly detection and intelligently grouping alerts, UEBA enables security teams to focus on the threats that pose the highest level of risk.

    The Exabeam Difference: A Full-Stack Security Operations Platform

    While many vendors offer point solutions, the Exabeam New-Scale Security Operations Platform delivers a full-stack, cloud-native security operations platform. We understand that different threat detection methods are better suited for specific use-cases—and we support them all. This means customers get the best of all worlds:

    • Baselining normal behavior: Establishing a comprehensive understanding of typical user and system activities, enabling the detection of subtle deviations that may indicate advanced or AI-generated threats
    • Patented session data model: Automatically correlating security events into unified, behavior-based sessions
    • Automated investigation and response: Reducing analyst workload by grouping threats into a structured timeline based on user and entity groupings
    • Support for correlation rules and logic trees: Allowing customers to leverage traditional security methodologies alongside UEBA
    • Open-source threat intelligence feed – Providing IoCs to supplement behavior-based detection for known threats

    With Exabeam New-Scale Analytics, security teams can detect and respond to AI-generated attacks in real time, without relying solely on static rules or threat feeds.

    Are you a LogRhythm customer looking to add UEBA to uplevel threat detection and support defense against generative AI attacks and insider threats? We have a solution for you. LogRhythm Intelligence delivers Exabeam UEBA directly to the LogRhythm UI.

    Conclusion: The Future of Security Is Behavior-Based

    As AI-generated attacks continue to evolve, security strategies must adapt. Static rules and threat feeds are no longer enough. UEBA is the only approach that can effectively detect unknown threats by focusing on behavioral anomalies rather than signatures.

    By implementing Exabeam New-Scale Analytics, organizations gain:

    • Real-time, self-learning threat detection
    • Automated correlation of user and entity behaviors
    • Precise risk scoring to alleviate alert fatigue

    With our full-stack security operations platform, Exabeam customers receive the best of all security methodologies—threat intelligence, correlation rules, and UEBA—all in one solution. No matter how sophisticated AI-generated attacks become, security teams can stay one step ahead.

    Want to experience Exabeam industry-leading UEBA capabilities for yourself? See, first-hand, how Exabeam stops hard to detect unknown threats with ease and automation. Free expert lead demo

    Kevin Binder

    Kevin Binder

    Senior Product Marketing Manager | Exabeam | Kevin Binder is a cybersecurity marketing professional based in Morgan Hill, CA. Kevin has over 20 years of experience in information security marketing with companies including Amazon Web Services, Citrix Systems, and Nortel Networks. In his previous roles, Kevin was responsible for go-to-market strategy for emerging technologies such as cloud-based security services, mobile device management, and user-behavior analytics. He received a B.S. degree in Managerial Economics from UC Davis. In his free time, Kevin enjoys spending time with family and friends, sporting events, and golf.

    More posts by Kevin Binder

    Learn More About Exabeam

    Learn about the Exabeam platform and expand your knowledge of information security with our collection of white papers, podcasts, webinars, and more.

    • Blog

      What’s New in LogRhythm SIEM October 2025

    • Blog

      What’s New with New-Scale in October 2025: Measurable, Automated, Everywhere Security Operations

    • Blog

      Catching the Quiet Threats: When Normal Isn’t Safe

    • Blog

      UEBA vs. XDR: Rethinking SIEM Augmentation in the AI Era

    • Blog

      How Exabeam Helps Organizations Adapt to Australia’s Privacy Reforms

    • White Paper

      Using MITRE ATT&CK® in Threat Hunting and Detection

    • Show More